incidents and accidents, hints and allegations
Recent Entries
2008 Hugo Nominations up

The full list.

There are some things I'm pleased about (The Arrival for Best Related Book! *waves rooting flag*), but my principal reaction to the Novel list is to be glad I'm not voting this year. I plan to read The Yiddish Policeman's Union and Brasyl, but my reaction to the other three—Rollback (Sawyer), The Last Colony (Scalzi), and Halting State (Stross)—is a collective "enh, more of the same." For personal, just finishing breakfast values thereof, though I suspect this is also affected by not seeing any of my novel nominees on the list.

(Post-shower clarification about the three S's: I'm allergic to Stross's fiction, and have decided not to read Scalzi's fiction for reasons that—trust me—have no application or relevance to anyone else. I don't think I need to explan about Sawyer.)

tags: ,
Quick commerce notes

  • 25% off accessories at the Palm store.
  • New hardcover omnibus of Barry Hughart's Chronicles of Master Li and Number Ten Ox forthcoming from Subterraenean Press.

    (If you just want to read the first draft of Bridge of Birds (narrated by a nineteen-year-old Master Li!), it's available from this fan site.)

tags: , ,
Elsewhere in Chateau Steelypips

While I work and suffer from the Wintertime Blues [*] and unusual prose sensitivity [**], Chad discusses our book shelves; poses a cheery hypothetical on love and death in preparation for teaching "Story of Your Life" (spoilers); and posts a more detailed explanation of the pregnancy health issues. And the dog hunts squeaky toys in the snow.

[*] John Hiatt (last.fm). Particularly:

There's no spring
There was never any spring
Spring's a long gone thing
There won't ever be a spring no more

Since my favorite line, "Three hours of daylight and all of them gray / the suicide prevention group has all run away," is no longer quite applicable.

Oh, and while I'm linking to music, have some pretty harmonies from a lesser-known alt-country/folk rock band called the Jayhawks who came up on shuffle recently:

  • "Save It for a Rainy Day" (YouTube)
  • "Stumbling Through the Dark" (YouTube)
  • "I'd Run Away" (last.fm)
  • "Blue" (YouTube) (also covered by The Thorns (last.fm))
  • live version of "Tailspin" with the Sadies (artist website)
  • short, poor-quality live snippet of the very pretty "All the Right Reasons" (YouTube)

[**] Decided not to attempt Acacia because the retrospective omniscient was grating on me. I hardly ever care about this stuff, what is my deal lately? Not that I have time to be reading now.

Quick miscellany

Screw flying cars. Where is my in-home custom clothing fabricator?

(Prompted by an unfun trip to get maternity clothes. Chad thought I was going to say "uterine replicator," but I pointed out that even if I wasn't needing maternity clothes now, I'd still have to buy clothes sometime.)

* * *

The first four episodes of Avatar: The Last Airbender were entertaining; pitched a little young, but that did make them undemanding after a long day. We'll probably keep watching.

* * *

Hugo nominees update:

Ragamuffin (booklog) and The Orphan's Tales: In the Cities of Coin and Spice (booklog) for novel; honorable mention to The Secret History of Moscow (booklog), which I am allergic to. The Arrival (booklog) for related book, which you all have to go out and get right this minute, seriously, I mean it!

I may try and squeeze in Acacia, but am unlikely to get to Shelter (I'm sick of winter and am not much for dystopias at the best of times).

* * *

Just a few links, because I've been spending all my delicious time on boskone reports.

links )

Q for those who've finished The Orphan's Tales

Do not click the cut unless you've finished both volumes of The Orphan's Tales. You won't be able to answer the question and it will ruin your reading experience. Really.

book-destroying SPOILERS for The Orphan's Tales: In the Cities of Coin and Spice )

tags: ,
Thanks, LJ

On your suggestion, I read The Steerswoman and really liked it.

tags:
Rec me Hugo nominees

Suddenly it's February, I have less than a month to get my Hugo nomination ballot in order, and so far my ballot consists solely of Shaun Tan's The Arrival (ETA: booklog entry) for Best Related Book. Eek!

cut for lists )

What else? I did a very quick search for 2007 lists and tagged them on delicious, if you're looking for reminders. Recommend me novels: but, it should be accompanied with specific reasons that I, personally, would like it, and as much or more than I might like the three things I plan to read. I will either ignore or mock anyone who fails to follow directions.

Tell me what to read

I'm having trouble picking my next book. The past few things I've read (The Somnambulist, A Matter of Oaths, The Truelove) haven't been satisfactory, which I think is leaving me very bleh about the prospect of putting effort into another book, rather than just mindlessly playing NetHack and web puzzle games. Today I tried reading a book I saw [info]oracne recommend, Anne Gracie's The Perfect Rake, and, finding myself unusually critical of the prose, put it down to try some other time.

So, a poll. I'm mostly looking for something that will be really satisfactory, something I can sink my teeth into without feeling cranky about the construction of the plot, or the prose, or the treatment of gender, or whatever. Strong likeable female characters a plus, after the unsatisfactory books above. I suspect that humor and quirk may be minuses rather than pluses just now; ditto very sad or very dark (yes, I know Use of Weapons is a poll choice, but I've read that before, know what I'm getting, and think it would be okay). Also, something that's not too much work at the beginning would be good.

Edit: thanks, all! As of 8:15 Wednesday morning The Steerswoman's Road has 44.4% of the votes, and that and the accompany comments have convinced me to bring it into work and try it over lunch. But feel free to suggest fallbacks or add data on the other stuff in the poll.

A dozen options, by author: )

tags: ,
Week in Review

A busy and fun week.

As I already said, there was the Springsteen concert, which was fabulous. Chad wrote that they didn't leave anything in the locker room, which is a good way of putting it. The encore exemplifies this: it started with "Girls in Their Summer Clothes," a new song with a sing-along chorus, and then "Thunder Road," and then the house lights came up for "Born to Run," which I expected was the end . . . but then there was "Dancing in the Dark," still with the house lights up, so I figured that was the end . . . but no, there was still one more, "American Land." The crowd was completely into it, belting along with the obscure "4th of July, Asbury Park (Sandy)" as much as the newer stuff or the classics, which increased the fun. I gave myself a coughing fit two-thirds of the way through "Born to Run" and came home exhausted and exhilarated.

Setlists: at the official site, with links to lyrics ("Thunder Road" has a lot of words), and at a fansite (search "restored calliope" for a picture of what puzzled me, too, at the opening). And the local paper's review.

Friday we had dinner with a classmate of Chad's, Ethan Zuckerman, and Rachel Barenblat, the Velveteen Rabbi—who has the best blog name and tagline: "When can I run and play with the real rabbis?" Great food, great conversation, and we'll have to go over to their neck of the woods sometime.

And my sister-in-law passed the California bar! Go, her! (56.1% pass rate overall, and 69.0% for first-time takers. Yikes—the equivalents for NY the year I took it was 67.5% and 76.5%.)

Saturday we had remarkably good home-repairs and -improvement luck, including the purchase of a bigger fridge that can be delivered before Thanksgiving. And then we watched the movie Stranger than Fiction, which I really enjoyed. Harold Crick is an IRS auditor with no life, who suddenly begins hearing a voice narrating his actions. Which is itself upsetting, but then the voice casually mentions his imminent death.

I asked Chad to NetFlix this because someone at the Worldcon Metafiction panel said that meta was the whole point, which is true. I've seen some reviews saying that the love story is the heart of the movie, which I just don't get: I found it flat, predictable, and unconvincing. (Ditto Queen Latifah's character, alas.) But I liked the meta, and the sad look on Harold Crick's face (Will Ferrell—no, don't run away, really!), and the slightly magic-realist flavor of it all. Recommended.

So, a really good entertainment week, as it also included Shaun Tan's The Arrival, a booklog gush about which is forthcoming, and new Saiyuki Gaiden (resulting in a few new icons). Though I didn't manage to finish the last WFC panel report, on Tolkien as a horror writer. (I do intend to; it's mostly done.)

Oh, and those of you who've read Grant's Daughter of the Game: I've gotten as far as chapter five, and I'm not particularly invested in any of the characters, plus I'm finding the prose slightly hard to fall in through. Should I bother with the rest of it?

World Fantasy Con: Urban Fantasy--Beyond the Usual Suspects

Description:

World Fantasy Con: Urban Fantasy—Beyond the Usual Suspects
It seems as if most urban fantasy uses the familiar European myths. What other possibilities are there? Which authors have successfully exploited them?
Ekaterina Sedia, Ernest Lilley (m), Marie Brennan, Melanie Fletcher, Jenna Black

(In post-panel conversation, Sedia and Brennan noted the problems with using "exploited" in that description.)

The vast majority of this panel was not about existing or possible non-European urban fantasies, but about cultural appropriation. The responsibility for this rests with the moderator. Not only did he seem to want to talk a lot about cultural appropriation, his comments—well, my most charitable interpretation was that his phrasing and manner were deliberately exaggerated to provoke discussion and, possibly, as an attempt at humor. (He specifically introduced his most offensive remark as a joke.) And they were certainly provoking.

This report is not about that part of the panel, because I do not want to host a discussion of cultural appropriation at this time. If the topic interests you, there's much to read already (try starting with International Blog Against Racism Week's posts), and of course you can always start a discussion in your own space. However, after the writing-and-cultural-defaults discussions this summer, well, I'd say I have PTSD on writing and race discussions except that it would trivialize actual trauma. Regardless: discussion of cultural appropriation: DO NOT WANT.

Here's what my notes boil down to, then:

Urban fantasies using non-European myths:

  • Lilith Saintcrow, Dante Valentine series (Anubis features prominently)
  • Neil Gaiman, American Gods ("mythology fanfic"—Brennan) and Anansi Boys
  • Liz Williams, Detective Chen series (Chinese Heaven and Hell as two other locations that characters move between routinely)
  • Sergei Lukyanenko, Night Watch trilogy (translated from the Russian and set in Russia; Brennan commented that the mythology felt much more generic than the mundane aspects)
  • Paper Cities, an anthology edited by Sedia
  • Jenn Reese, Jade Tiger (Chinese-American protagonist)
  • C.E. Murphy, the Walker Papers, starting with Urban Shaman (American Indian themes, maybe protagonist? (first is on the to-read bookcase))
  • Tim Powers, Last Call, Expiration Date (American fantasy; though Last Call is the Fisher King in Las Vegas)
  • Sean Stewart's non-secondary-world fantasy [with varying degrees of urbanity, I think]

General comments:

  • Brennan: there are two extreme poles of approach: on one hand, there's the American Gods diaspora, and on the other, why can't I do urban fantasy set in India?
  • Sedia: re: filing serial numbers off cultures: that's probably easier in secondary worlds, since urban fantasy takes place in urban, contemporary, real places.
  • Brennan maintains an extensive list of multi-cultural fantasy.

After the panel:

  • K.J. Bishop, The Etched City
  • Catherynne M. Valente, The Orphan's Tales
  • Ian McDonald, River of Gods (set in India)

So: let's do the panel here. Comments on the books listed above? Recommendations of other books? Really cool things that haven't been written yet but should be? And if people want to give their definitions of urban fantasy, go ahead—though I'm not particularly interested in picking a definition as long as I know what you're using.

[Edited to promote a link from the comments: [info]swan_tower has broader questions over in panel, take two.]

Jones, Dogsbody (SPOILERS)

Over on my booklog, I posted in non-spoiler terms about Diana Wynne Jones's Dogsbody. Behind the spoiler-protection of the cut here, though, I'd like to ask people who liked the ending to explain it to me.

spoilers here and in comments )

tags:
World Fantasy Con: everything but the panels

An attempt to do a quick (later: hah!) overview of the con before I crash completely. Responses to comments on the last post, panel reports, and miscellaneous substantive stuff forthcoming.

Organizational Problems: My problem with this World Fantasy Con was not what everyone warned me about, people spending all their time networking and not having any fun. Instead, it was that the organizational problems robbed the con of much of its potential.

Things like the free book bags, which had books from two publishers left out; Night Shade's books were at least added later on, but Tor's books were returned to sender (!). And the autograph reception: I might have gone and used the opportunity to say hi to people I hadn't run into yet, but no-one knew who was going to be autographing. I mean that literally: I asked someone about it three hours ahead of time, and she said, "I signed last year and I've heard nothing this year. Is it tonight? I didn't even know that." Since that filled me with no confidence at all, I just went home early that night. (I'm told that the con ended up addressing the "not sure who's signing" problem by printing name signs for every single member of the con. This seems sub-optimal.)

But most importantly, there was the programming. I'd already observed that it looked pretty thin, and I'm told that it was so even by WFC standards. And some really baffling decisions were made. For instance, [info]truepenny was not on a panel on ghosts in Shakespeare, despite having five books out, being a runner-up for the Campbell, and, oh yeah—having written her dissertation on the revenge tragedies of early modern England, including a whole chapter on Hamlet's ghost! And a panel on Native American Spirits had no Native Americans on it, until the moderator saw Joseph Bruchac, an Abenaki Indian author and storyteller and one of the Special Guests, in the audience and invited him up. How do you schedule a panel on Native American spirits and not include him from the start?

There was some good programming, about which more later. But I don't think anything near the full potential was fulfilled, and that's too bad.

I should say that the hospitality suite had a lot of good food, and that the Saratoga Hotel and Conference Center seemed to be doing very well by the con. At one party, I saw a hotel staff member come by—not to ask people to keep the noise down, but to ask whether the party needed anything else! At another, I saw someone come by early on to empty the trash and bring more ice.

Readings: I heard Tamora Pierce read from the forthcoming Beka Cooper book, Bloodhound; Scott Lynch read from the forthcoming Gentlemen Bastards book, The Republic of Thieves; and Guy Gavriel Kay read from Ysabel. cut for length )

Socializing: some large proportion of the good bits of cons is hanging out with folks, and I was lucky enough to find plenty of people who weren't hyper-focused on business. I got to spend a good bit of time talking with [info]batwrangler and [info]oracne, who is as good a conversation-accretor as Scalzi; have dinner with [info]truepenny; meet [info]lnhammer, [info]janni, and Patrick O'Leary; and fangirl [info]1crowdedhour. And I usually don't do the name-dropping bit because I find it weird and uncomfortable, but that's the shortest possible version of the list of people who made the con fun for me, so I feel like I ought to give y'all shout-outs.

Discoveries:

  • Shaun Tan is a fabulous Australian artist, my most exciting discovery of the con. After seeing images from his books The Arrival and The Lost Thing at the art show, I went straight to the dealer's room to see if I could buy them (the prints being gorgeous but out of my price range, and anyway we don't have much in the way of wall space). Unsurprisingly, the dealer's room was sold out.

    Go look at his books page to see some of the images. Seriously, you won't regret it. (I think my favorite is "The City" from The Arrival.)

  • If you ever get the opportunity to see Joseph Bruchac (website, presently down) perform, definitely go. He did a wonderful performance of American Indian ghost and monster stories, including not one but two cannibal skeletons. Fabulous storytelling, plus informational bits about American Indian culture.
  • The cover for Jhegaala, the next Vlad Taltos book, was in the art show. It is very cool, and Stephen Hickman happened to be standing right there, so I got to tell him so.

    (I haven't been reading Brust's LJ so I don't know how much is public about this book yet. I don't think it's too much of a spoiler to say, though, that we will finally learn what happened to Vlad's little finger.)

Oh, and Chad posted a picture and list of the final haul. And here's live-blogging of Kay's Master of Ceremonies speech and the list of World Fantasy Award winners (we didn't stay for the ceremony—why they hold it on Sunday afternoon is beyond me.)

WFC free stuff, scavenger hunt

Here's what our free-books bags at World Fantasy Con contained:

  • The First Betrayal (The Chronicles of Josan, Book 1) by Patricia Bray (2006)
  • The Curse of the Raven Mocker by Marly Youmans (2006)
  • Undertow by Elizabeth Bear (2007)
  • Carmen Dog by Carol Emshwiller (2004) (two copies)
  • The Faery Reel: Tales from the Twilight Realm (2006)
  • 20th Century Ghosts by Joe Hill (2007)
  • Wizardry and Wild Romance: A Study of Epic Fantasy by Michael Moorcock (2004)
  • Things That Never Were: Fantasies, Lunacies & Entertaining Lies by Matthew Rossi (2003)
  • The Leopard Mask (The Guin Saga, Book 1) by Kaoru Kurimoto (2003) (two copies)
  • The Wit and Wisdom of Discworld, complied by Stephen Briggs
  • A miscellany of samplers, Fantasy & Science Fiction issues, and other stuff.

I was vaguely planning to read The Faery Reel and 20th Century Ghosts already, so that was good. Any comments about the rest?

Also, on the topic of free books: Chad has posted about the Fantasy Novel Scavenger Hunt we came up with: "participants would be given a list of things to find, and sent to the Dealer's Room or free book bags to find them and bring them back." Here's what he's got to get things started:

  • One book featuring a telepathic bond between a human and an animal.
  • Three books with dubious guilds (Thieves Guild, Prostitute's Guild, etc.)
  • Three characters with D'Read A'Postro'phes in their names [no kidding, one of the Aussie books had a single name with three apostrophes in it!]
  • A book with a map in the front, in which the characters visit every single country on the map.
  • A book with a faintly insulting "Exotic" setting.

I think participants should automatically win if they come back with a copy of The Tough Guide to Fantasyland, myself. But what else?

Another Japan reading poll

Here are the books that I am definitely taking to Japan:

  • Scott Lynch, Red Seas Under Red Skies
  • Kij Johnson, The Fox Woman and Fudoki
  • R.H.P. Mason, A History of Japan
  • Sei Shonagon, The Pillow Book

I am possibly bringing various John M. Ford books that I haven't read yet, in case that memorial panel actually happens—does anyone know if it's going to? If not, well, Ford is not my ideal vacation reading.

For the last half-dozen-ish slots, I find myself with a plethora of mass-market paperbacks, so, like everyone else: a poll!

possible books )

IBARW: Kenji Yoshino, Covering: The Hidden Assault on Our Civil Rights

In Covering: The Hidden Assault on Our Civil Rights, Kenji Yoshino argues for a new way of looking at discrimination and civil rights. As the title indicates, this centers on the concept of covering, or downplaying a disfavored trait to blend in:

Famous examples of covering abound. Ramón Estévez covered his ethnicity when he changed his name to Martin Sheen, as did Krishna Bhanji when he changed his name to Ben Kingsley. Margaret Thatcher covered her status as a woman when she trained with a voice coach to lower the timbre of her voice. Long after they came out as lesbians, Rosie O'Donnell and Mary Cheney still covered, keeping their same-sex partners out of the public eye. Issur Danielovitch Demsky covered his Judaism when he became Kirk Douglas, as did Joseph Levitch when he became Jerry Lewis. Franklin Delano Roosevelt covered his disability by ensuring his wheelchair was always hidden behind a desk before his Cabinet entered.

The central argument of the book is that covering is an assault on civil rights because it is an assault on autonomy. If one has a right to be something, one has the right to do the things that one feels are part of that identity. Otherwise, "the demand to cover . . . is the symbolic heartland of inequality—what reassures one group of its superiority to another." In other words, though assimiliation can be necessary for peaceful co-existence, its dark side also should be recognized.

The book is a blend of memoir, history, and legal analysis. It begins with a chapter of memoir, charting the author's "struggle to arrive at a gay identity." Yoshino did undergraduate and graduate work in literature before switching law when he accepted his sexuality—because, he writes, "A gay poet is vulnerable in profession as well as person"—and all of the autobiographical portions of the book are elegant and precise. And in the later chapters Yoshino moves between memoir and history or legal analysis with a remarkable fluidity, never jarring me in the transition.

After the context-setting opening chapter, the book divides into three parts. The first is an examination of gay history, which is itself divided into three parts: conversion, or attempts to change sexual orientation; passing, or attempts to hide sexual orientation; and covering, or attempts not to flaunt sexual orientation. Each section emphasizes how it is still a current problem. Conversion lives in the idea that homosexuality is "contagious" and therefore children need to be protected from the promotion of homosexuality in schools, and passing in the U.S. military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy. And both can co-exist with covering, such as in custody cases:

[When denying] custody to a lesbian mother in 1990, a Louisiana appellate court cited "open, indiscreet displays of affection beyond mere friendship . . . where the child is of an age where gender identity is being formed." If acceptable sexuality for same-sex couples is limited to the appearance of friendship, then the expectations for parents are clearly not orientation-neutral.

Notice as well why such covering is required—parental flaunting is dangerous because it could convert a child whose "gender identity is being formed." All three demands for assimilation are simultaneously in play—because children must not be converted, parents must pass to their children and cover to the courts. The shifts from conversion to passing to covering . . . are shifts in emphasis.

The book then considers covering as applied to race and sex, drawing its examples mostly from the employment context. One of the new wrinkles it examines is reverse covering, particularly with regard to women. For most non-dominant groups, the pressure to reverse cover comes from other group members. Women, however, are pressured to cover and reverse cover at the same time and by the same outside group (men), that is, "to be 'masculine' enough to be respected as workers, but also 'feminine' enough to be respected as women."

(Though the book focuses on groups currently protected by civil rights law, because it's written by a law professor, the book takes care to note that everyone covers in ways small and large: "the mainstream is a myth. . . . All of us struggle for self-expression; we all have covered selves.")

Finally, in the shortest section, the book looks at models of civil rights law. It considers two areas in which the idea of accommodation is supposed to be recognized, religion and disability, and examines the pressures towards assimilation within those areas of law. It then argues for a new model of civil rights:

  • The law right now tends to prohibit only discrimination based on immutable traits. This is misguided: the question should not be whether a person can change, but whether the person should be made to change.
  • One way the law can do this is by focusing on common liberties/fundamental rights, rather than on whether group X needs additional protection. This is partly because courts are more likely to be comfortable with such a formulation, and partly because the group X formulation brings up the question of what's essential to being part of group X, which is dangerously near stereotyping.
  • The law is limited in effectiveness and appropriateness when it comes to covering:

    When I hesitate before engaging in a public display of same-sex affection, I am not thinking of the state or my employer, but of the strangers around me and my own internal censor. And while I am often tempted to sue myself, this is not my healthiest impulse.

    Instead, civil rights law should be part of broader attempts to view ourselves and others with compassion and understanding.

On the whole, I think this is a well-written, useful, and accessible book. It's true that unless carefully deployed, the idea of covering could reinforce stereotypes. As a colleague of Yoshino's puts it, "One way minorities break stereotypes is by acting against them. If every time they do so, people assume they are 'covering' some essential stereotypical identity, the stereotypes will never go away." For this reason, the book attempts to emphasize individual autonomy and authenticity, rejecting demands to reverse cover as well as cover; I think this bears repeating, because it strikes me as the kind of point likely to get lost in general discussions. Also, because describing solutions is harder than describing problems, the final section feels a bit slight (and also strikes me as having somewhat more jargon than the prior sections). However, by targeting a general audience, the book necessarily limits the amount of legal implementation details it can offer.

The idea that everyone covers immediately resonated with me, and I have begun thinking about my own covering and whether all of it is necessary or useful. I hope that when others recognize the concept, they will do the same, and in the process gain awareness of and empathy for those who are pressured to cover without good reason.

(The book's preface, which functions as a short summary, can be read online, as can the scholarly law article which originated the concept (choose "View as PDF" from this Yale Law Journal page).)

(ETA: see also a long New York Times article by Yoshino, The Pressure to Cover, which functions as a long (5,000 words) summary. Thanks to [info]ckd for the link.)

[Cross-posted to my booklog.]

Posted elsewhere

Possibly of interest to those who don't regularly read my book log: non-spoilery and spoilery posts on Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, and my Hugo and Campbell ballot.

Harry Potter and the Peculiar Symbolism (Book 7 SPOILERS)

Spoilers. (Duh.)

book-destroying spoilers )

Finally, the jacket copy absolutely cracked me up.

AKICILJ: Cambodia

Before I disappear into reading Harry Potter

Is there anyone reading this who is either from Cambodia or is knowledgable about contemporary Cambodian culture, and who's read Geoff Ryman's Hugo-nominated novellete "Pol Pol's Beautiful Daughter" (pdf)? Because I read it last night and its use of Cambodia is making me uncomfortable, but I am very ignorant on the subject.

ETA: I've now booklogged this story and the rest of the nominees in the category.

tags: ,
Two Will Shetterly novels online

Will Shetterly has put two novels online under a CC license, the very fine Dogland and its new sequel, The Gospel of the Knife. You can find links to them in his announcement post, but they've been forcibly line-wrapped to 75 characters; so I've reformatted their HTML, given them hyperlinked tables of contents, and also turned them into files for Palm's eReader. They're up at http://www.steelypips.org/miscellany/shetterly/.

tags: ,
An Open Letter to Spectra and Ace

Dear Publishers,

You have inconveniently scheduled books by two of this year's Campbell nominees, Sarah Monette's The Mirador and Scott Lynch's Red Seas Under Red Skies, for release too late for me to read them before voting at the end of July.

This makes me sad, because reading those books might very well make a difference in my vote. And maybe it should make you sad, because I promise to write thoughtful reviews about them, as I did for the other books by the Campbell nominees that I've read so far. (It makes my dog sad, too. Look at that sad face.) Wouldn't it be nice if we could all be happy?

I'll be glad to provide you with a mailing address, or even an e-mail address to which you could send an electronic copy—I'm not fussy, and I promise to be well-behaved.

(My motives are entirely pure, of course, and this has nothing whatsoever to do with the fact that I really really want to read them. Uh-uh. Nope. Nosiree.)

Very truly yours,

(To my deep annoyance, I see that Bantam was randomly giving out 20 copies of Red Seas, the due date for entering which was—yesterday. Well, at least I've finally finished re-reading and logging Mélusine and The Virtu, and can proceed to Elantris, and then to the Hugo nominees. I'm making progress, honest . . . )

tags: ,